Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Roslyn Ross's avatar

While clinically speaking the assessment of Israel as a winner makes sense, when one applies common sense, it hardly appears to be a win.

Israel has not routed Hamas or Hezbollah and is simply hated even more by Palestinians and Lebanese, if that were even possible, and now it has opened a third front in Syria with the same goal, occupation and colonisation.

It is one thing to take land in times of chaos but quite another to secure it. Israel does not even have the boots on the ground to secure Occupied Palestine in general and Gaza in particular. Yes, it can continue murdering people, nearly half of them children, but that is not securing an area. Same with Lebanon.

The Israeli modus operandi is primitive and backward like much about the society, the belief being if you demonstrate your capacity to destroy and kill then your enemy will be forced into compliance and you will control them, or at least have power over them. If that approach worked then Israel would have had 75 years of peaceful compliance from the Palestinians, instead of ever-increasing resistance and determination to be free.

One suspects, again simply applying common sense, that the Syria invasion is more for the brainwashed Israeli market to demonstrate, look how powerful we are, look how they run from us, and look at how much more land we can take for you to settle! Delusional of course but then delusion is the middle name for Israel.

But, having invaded and put some boots on the ground in Syria, Israel now has to secure land in three countries powerfully enough to send in the settlers. And for the settlers to be safe, Israel needs plenty of boots on the ground in Palestine, Lebanon and Syria.

It doesn't have access to those boots. In Israel the workers are the soldiers and they are either working and keeping the economy afloat or they are working at killing and occupying and the economy is in tatters. Sure they could complicate it all by bringing in mercenaries but that is always an oil and water mix requiring huge amounts of money, time, attention and monitoring.

Israel has soldiers who are seriously mentally ill and we see that from the videos they take of themselves. They also have a high suicide and defection rate. The society is now loathed around the world which only increases paranoia which only intensifies mental illness. How can such a sick society, experienced only in targeting civilians under occupation, even create a military with the structure, order and discipline required to occupy and subdue two other countries?

Perhaps as a military expert you can explain what I am getting wrong?

Expand full comment
Linda Hagge's avatar

This is the VERY BEST analysis I've seen from anyone on the Syria situation, and I've read at least a dozen so far on Substack. I think you got rolled by your spellcheck, though. Of a half dozen uses of the word "discrete," only one was correct, and the rest were spelled "discreet." Also, you have "want" for "wont." This would not be important, but it's so good I think you should shop it to a journal like Consortium News or another independent news source.

Expand full comment
212 more comments...

No posts